Login | Register   
LinkedIn
Google+
Twitter
RSS Feed
Download our iPhone app
TODAY'S HEADLINES  |   ARTICLE ARCHIVE  |   FORUMS  |   TIP BANK
Browse DevX
Sign up for e-mail newsletters from DevX


advertisement
 

Change the Rules of C++ with Defaulted Functions

C++ has rigid rules regarding the automatic generation of the four canonical member functions. Overriding these rules hasn't been possible thus far. However, the new C++09 defaulted functions give you more control over the compiler's generated canonical functions.


advertisement
rogrammers have little control over the implicit declarations of the four canonical member functions. The compiler will not generate a default constructor for a class that has a user-declared copy-constructor. This frustrating state of affairs is about to change. The deleted and defaulted functions proposal provides a convenient mechanism for just this type of per-class customization. The following sections will show you how to use defaulted functions.


In certain cases, you need to define a default constructor manually, because the compiler will not implicitly-declare it. Not only is manual constructor definition tedious, it's also not very efficient.


Use the new =default function specifier to make the compiler generate a member function that wouldn't be generated otherwise.



Presenting the Problem
Suppose you're designing a class that requires a user-defined copy constructor:

class C { public: C(const C& rhs); };

Later, when you try to create an object for this class, you get a compilation error:

C obj;//error: no default constructor exists for class C C * pc= new C; //same error

This kind of error can baffle even experienced programmers. Wasn't the compiler supposed to implicitly declare a default constructor for class C? No, it wasn't. When you declare a copy constructor in a class, the compiler doesn't implicitly-declare a default constructor in that class. What if you want the compiler to generate a default constructor for you anyway? In C++03, there's no way to override these language rules; you simply have to define the missing default constructor manually:

class C { public: C(const C& rhs); C() {} //manual definition of a default constructor }; C obj; //OK

Not only is this tedious, the user-defined default constructor is often less efficient than the compiler's implicitly-defined default constructor.



Comment and Contribute

 

 

 

 

 


(Maximum characters: 1200). You have 1200 characters left.

 

 

Sitemap