Login | Register   
LinkedIn
Google+
Twitter
RSS Feed
Download our iPhone app
TODAY'S HEADLINES  |   ARTICLE ARCHIVE  |   FORUMS  |   TIP BANK
Browse DevX
Sign up for e-mail newsletters from DevX


advertisement
 

Top 10 Security Vulnerabilities in .NET Configuration Files : Page 3

Developers often concentrate on writing secure code but leave security vulnerabilities in application configuration files. Discover the most common configuration security problems—and how to avoid them.


advertisement
4. Cookies Accessible Through Client-Side Script
In Internet Explorer 6.0, Microsoft introduced a new cookie property called HttpOnly. While you can set the property programmatically, you can set it generically in the site configuration.

Vulnerable: Secure:

<configuration>
<system.Web>
<httpCookies httpOnlyCookies="false">

<configuration>
<system.Web>
<httpCookies httpOnlyCookies="true">


Any cookie marked with this property will be accessible only from server-side code, and not to any client-side scripting code like JavaScript or VBScript. This shielding of cookies from the client helps to protect the application from cross-site scripting attacks. A hacker initiates a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack by attempting to insert his script code into the Web page. Any page that accepts input from a user and echoes that input back is potentially vulnerable. For example, a login page that prompts for a user name and password and then displays "Welcome back, <username>" on a successful login is possibly susceptible to an XSS attack.

Message board or forum pages are also often vulnerable. In these pages, legitimate users post their thoughts or opinions, which are then visible to all other visitors to the site. But an attacker, rather than posting about the current topic, will instead post a message such as <script>alert(document.cookie);</script>. The message board now includes the attacker's script code in its page code—and the browser then interprets and executes it for future site visitors. Usually attackers use such script code to try to obtain the user's authentication token (usually stored in a cookie), which they could then use to impersonate the user. When cookies are marked with the HttpOnly property, their values are hidden from the client, so this attack will fail.

It is possible to enable HttpOnly programmatically on any individual cookie by setting the HttpOnly property of the HttpCookie object to true. However, it is easier and more reliable to configure the application to automatically enable HttpOnly for all cookies. To do this, set the httpOnlyCookies attribute of the <httpCookies> element to true.

5. Cookieless Session State Enabled
In the initial 1.0 release of ASP.NET, you had no choice about how to transmit the session token between requests when your Web application needed to maintain session state: it was always stored in a cookie. Unfortunately, this meant that users who would not accept cookies could not use your application. So, in ASP.NET 1.1, Microsoft added support for cookieless session tokens via use of the "cookieless" setting.

Vulnerable: Secure:


<configuration>
<system.Web>
<sessionState cookieless="UseUri">

<configuration>
<system.Web>
<sessionState cookieless="UseCookies">


Web applications configured to use cookieless session state now stored the session token in the page URLs rather than a cookie. For example, the page URL might change from http://myserver/MyApplication/default.aspx to http://myserver/MyApplication/(123456789ABCDEFG)/default.aspx. In this case, 123456789ABCDEFG represents the current user's session token. A different user browsing the site at the same time would receive a completely different session token, resulting in a different URL, such as http://myserver/MyApplication/(ZYXWVU987654321)/default.aspx.

While adding support for cookieless session state did improve the usability of ASP.NET Web applications for users who would not accept cookies, it also had the side effect of making those applications much more vulnerable to session hijacking attacks. Session hijacking is basically a form of identity theft wherein a hacker impersonates a legitimate user by stealing his session token. When the session token is transmitted in a cookie, and the request is made on a secure channel (that is, it uses SSL), the token is secure. However, when the session token is included as part of the URL, it is much easier for a hacker to find and steal it. By using a network monitoring tool (also known as a "sniffer") or by obtaining a recent request log, hijacking the user's session becomes a simple matter of browsing to the URL containing the stolen unique session token. The Web application has no way of knowing that this new request with session token 123456789ABCDEFG is not coming from the original, legitimate user. It happily loads the corresponding session state and returns the response back to the hacker, who has now effectively impersonated the user.

The most effective way to prevent these session hijacking attacks is to force your Web application to use cookies to store the session token. This is accomplished by setting the cookieless attribute of the <sessionState> element to UseCookies or false. But what about the users who do not accept cookies? Do you have to choose between making your application available to all users versus ensuring that it operates securely for all users? A compromise between the two is possible in ASP.NET 2.0. By setting the cookieless attribute to AutoDetect, the application will store the session token in a cookie for users who accept them and in the URL for those who won't. This means that only the users who use cookieless tokens will still be vulnerable to session hijacking. That's often acceptable, given the alternative—that users who deny cookies wouldn't be able to use the application at all. It is ironic that many users disable cookies because of privacy concerns when doing so can actually make them more prone to attack.

Intermission
The first five Web.config vulnerabilities discussed in this article have been applicable to all ASP.NET Web applications regardless of their methods of authentication, or even whether they use authentication at all. The next five apply only to applications using Forms authentication. If this applies to your Web sites, please read on. If not, don't leave yet! After the top-ten list is complete, I'll show you some methods of locking down your configuration files so that they can't be modified unintentionally.



Comment and Contribute

 

 

 

 

 


(Maximum characters: 1200). You have 1200 characters left.

 

 

Sitemap