dcsimg
Login | Register   
LinkedIn
Google+
Twitter
RSS Feed
Download our iPhone app
TODAY'S HEADLINES  |   ARTICLE ARCHIVE  |   FORUMS  |   TIP BANK
Browse DevX
Sign up for e-mail newsletters from DevX

By submitting your information, you agree that devx.com may send you DevX offers via email, phone and text message, as well as email offers about other products and services that DevX believes may be of interest to you. DevX will process your information in accordance with the Quinstreet Privacy Policy.


Tip of the Day
Language: C++
Expertise: Intermediate
Oct 29, 1998

WEBINAR:

On-Demand

Building the Right Environment to Support AI, Machine Learning and Deep Learning


User-Defined New and Delete Cannot be Declared in a Namespace

Operators new and delete can be declared in a class scope. However, the Standard prohibits declarations of these operators in a namespace. Why is this? Consider the following example:
 
char *pc; 
namespace A { 
void operator new ( size_t ); 
void operator delete ( void * );
void func () {
	  pc = new char ( 'a');
}
}

void f() { delete pc; } // which version of delete to call, A::delete or standard delete?
 
Some programmers would expect the operator A::delete to be selected since it matches the operator new that was used to allocate the storage. Others would expect the standard operator delete to be called since A::delete is not visible in function f. By prohibiting declarations of new and delete in a namespace, you can avoid this hassle.
Danny Kalev
 
Comment and Contribute

 

 

 

 

 


(Maximum characters: 1200). You have 1200 characters left.

 

 

Sitemap
Thanks for your registration, follow us on our social networks to keep up-to-date