Login | Register   
RSS Feed
Download our iPhone app
Browse DevX
Sign up for e-mail newsletters from DevX

By submitting your information, you agree that devx.com may send you DevX offers via email, phone and text message, as well as email offers about other products and services that DevX believes may be of interest to you. DevX will process your information in accordance with the Quinstreet Privacy Policy.

Tip of the Day
Language: C++
Expertise: Intermediate
Jun 7, 1999



Building the Right Environment to Support AI, Machine Learning and Deep Learning

Accessing a C++ Object in C Code: Different Access Specifiers

The fourth restriction on the legality of accessing C++ objects from C code states that all the data members of the class must be declared without an intervening access specifier. This means, theoretically, that the memory layout of a class that looks similar to this example might differ from a class that has the same data members, which are declared in the same order, albeit without any intervening access specifiers:

class AnotherDate  // has intervening access specifiers
  int day;
  int month;
  int year;
  //constructor and destructor
  AnotherDate(); //current date
  //a non-virtual member function
  bool isLeap() const;
  bool operator == (const Date& other);

In other words, for class AnotherDate, an implementation is allowed to place the member 'month' before the member 'day', 'year' before 'month', or whatever. Of course, this nullifies any compatibility with a C struct. However, in practice, all current C++ compilers ignore the access specifiers and store the data members in the order of declaration. So C code that accesses a class object that has multiple access specifiers should work, but there is no guarantee that the compatibility will remain in the future.

Danny Kalev
Comment and Contribute






(Maximum characters: 1200). You have 1200 characters left.



Thanks for your registration, follow us on our social networks to keep up-to-date