dcsimg
Login | Register   
RSS Feed
Download our iPhone app
TODAY'S HEADLINES  |   ARTICLE ARCHIVE  |   FORUMS  |   TIP BANK
Browse DevX
Sign up for e-mail newsletters from DevX

By submitting your information, you agree that devx.com may send you DevX offers via email, phone and text message, as well as email offers about other products and services that DevX believes may be of interest to you. DevX will process your information in accordance with the Quinstreet Privacy Policy.


Tip of the Day
Language: Enterprise
Expertise: Advanced
Aug 3, 1999

WEBINAR:

On-Demand

Application Security Testing: An Integral Part of DevOps


Choose vtble or dispinterface Depending on how the COM Component is invoked

For an in-proc COM component, a vtbl interface is generally in the order of 100 times faster than a dispinterface (although it depends on type of arguments in the function). For a out-of-proc component, the overhead of marshalling is more significant than overhead of IDispatch::invoke and so a vtbl interface is generally 2.5 times faster than a dispinterface. For a remote component however, it doesn

Jai Bardhan
 
Comment and Contribute

 

 

 

 

 


(Maximum characters: 1200). You have 1200 characters left.

 

 

Sitemap
×
We have made updates to our Privacy Policy to reflect the implementation of the General Data Protection Regulation.
Thanks for your registration, follow us on our social networks to keep up-to-date