dcsimg
Login | Register   
RSS Feed
Download our iPhone app
TODAY'S HEADLINES  |   ARTICLE ARCHIVE  |   FORUMS  |   TIP BANK
Browse DevX
Sign up for e-mail newsletters from DevX

By submitting your information, you agree that devx.com may send you DevX offers via email, phone and text message, as well as email offers about other products and services that DevX believes may be of interest to you. DevX will process your information in accordance with the Quinstreet Privacy Policy.


Tip of the Day
Language: C++
Expertise: Beginner
Aug 29, 2000

WEBINAR:

On-Demand

Application Security Testing: An Integral Part of DevOps


Avoid Redundant Inline Declarations

Remember that functions defined inside the class definition are implicitly inline. Therefore, the inline keyword is redundant in the definition of the member function of the following class:

 
class Employee
{
public:
 inline const string& name() const {return _name;}
private
 string _name;
};

The inline specifier is innocuous in this example. However, it can become a maintenance problem if you move the definition of name() outside the class and extend it with more functionality (for example, if you convert the string to uppercase before returning it to the caller). You are likely to forget that the member function is still declared inline, although it shouldn't be.

Danny Kalev
 
Comment and Contribute

 

 

 

 

 


(Maximum characters: 1200). You have 1200 characters left.

 

 

Sitemap
×
We have made updates to our Privacy Policy to reflect the implementation of the General Data Protection Regulation.
Thanks for your registration, follow us on our social networks to keep up-to-date