dcsimg
Login | Register   
RSS Feed
Download our iPhone app
TODAY'S HEADLINES  |   ARTICLE ARCHIVE  |   FORUMS  |   TIP BANK
Browse DevX
Sign up for e-mail newsletters from DevX

By submitting your information, you agree that devx.com may send you DevX offers via email, phone and text message, as well as email offers about other products and services that DevX believes may be of interest to you. DevX will process your information in accordance with the Quinstreet Privacy Policy.


Tip of the Day
Home » Tip Bank » C++
Language: C++
Expertise: All
Aug 21, 2001

WEBINAR:

On-Demand

Application Security Testing: An Integral Part of DevOps


Avoid Unnecessary Constructors and Destructors


Some programmers consistently define an empty constructor and destructor in their classes, as in:
 
class A
{
//..
public:
 A() {}
 ~A() {}
};

This is totally useless. C++ guarantees that when a class needs any of the four special member functions (default constructor, copy constructor, assignment operator and destructor), the compiler will synthesize it, unless the programmer explicitly declared it. In the example above, the programmer defined empty constructor and destructor although the class clearly doesn't need any of these. Hadn't the programmer declared these member functions, the class would have been more compact and easier to maintain. Furthermore, this practice violates a common C++ principle: Don't write code that the compiler can generate correctly by itself
Danny Kalev
 
Comment and Contribute

 

 

 

 

 


(Maximum characters: 1200). You have 1200 characters left.

 

 

Sitemap
×
We have made updates to our Privacy Policy to reflect the implementation of the General Data Protection Regulation.
Thanks for your registration, follow us on our social networks to keep up-to-date