dcsimg
Login | Register   
RSS Feed
Download our iPhone app
TODAY'S HEADLINES  |   ARTICLE ARCHIVE  |   FORUMS  |   TIP BANK
Browse DevX
Sign up for e-mail newsletters from DevX

By submitting your information, you agree that devx.com may send you DevX offers via email, phone and text message, as well as email offers about other products and services that DevX believes may be of interest to you. DevX will process your information in accordance with the Quinstreet Privacy Policy.


Tip of the Day
Home » Tip Bank » C++
Language: C++
Expertise: Intermediate
Dec 14, 2001

WEBINAR:

On-Demand

Application Security Testing: An Integral Part of DevOps


A Class with a Virtual Function Should Have a Virtual Destructor


A rule of thumb in class design says that if a class has at least one virtual function, it should have a virtual destructor, too. This is because the presence of a virtual member function implies that the class may serve as a base class. To ensure that the right destructor is called when you're using a pointer or a reference to a base that actually point to a derived object, the destructor must be virtual. For example:
 
class character_device
{
public:
 virtual int read(char * p, int sz)=0;
 virtual ~ character_device()=0;
};
class modem: public character device
{
//..
public:
int read(char * p, int sz); //implement pure virtual _
method ~modem();
};

character_device * pcd=new modem; 
//..use pcd
delete pcd; // ok, calls pcd->~modem()
Danny Kalev
 
Comment and Contribute

 

 

 

 

 


(Maximum characters: 1200). You have 1200 characters left.

 

 

Sitemap
×
We have made updates to our Privacy Policy to reflect the implementation of the General Data Protection Regulation.
Thanks for your registration, follow us on our social networks to keep up-to-date