Browse DevX
Sign up for e-mail newsletters from DevX

Tip of the Day
Language: Java Language
Expertise: Beginner
Dec 4, 1998



Building the Right Environment to Support AI, Machine Learning and Deep Learning

Inner Classes

Why can't I have a static member in an inner class?

The simple answer is that static member variables and methods are disallowed by the Inner Classes Specification that was introduced with Java 1.1. But that alone will not satisfy most people looking for an answer to this question. You want to know why this is disallowed by the specification. Before moving on to that, I should distinguish between an inner class and a static inner class. An inner class is a class declared within the scope of another class, either local to a class declaration (i.e., as a class member), a block of statements, or an expression (in which case it is an anonymous class). However, it is possible to define a static inner class within a top-level class declaration. A class defined in this way is itself treated as a top-level class, meaning that it can only access its own members and static members of its enclosing class. But since it is declared within the scope of another class, it cannot be referenced outside of the enclosing class without specifying a qualified name (e.g., OuterClassName.InnerClassName).

Inner classes cannot have static members because static members are top-level lexical entities. In other words, static members are accessible outside of a given class's scope. Inner classes themselves are not top-level entities, being bound to specific instances of their enclosing class. If you feel you really must have an inner class to have static member, just define that variable as a member of the enclosing class. But it so happens that static inner class can have static members. This is because they are top-level classes, and as such are not bound to specific instances of their enclosing class. The best way to think about all of this is to consider inner classes and static inner classes as two different animals by introducing the term nested class, which is loosely used in the Inner Classes Specification. Think of both types of classes as nested classes, and only use the term inner class to refer to non-static nested classes. Therefore a static nested class is not really an inner class, and can have static members. The following example differentiates the behavior of inner classes and static nested classes with respect to static members:

public class InnerClassExample {
  private String __privateMember = "__privateMember";
  private static String __staticPrivateMember = "__staticPrivateMember";

  // This is an inner class, it cannot have static members.
  public class InnerClass1 {
    public void print() {

  // This is a static nested class, which makes it a top-level class,
  // allowing it to have static members.
  public static class InnerClass2 {
    public static String __staticInnerClass2Member =

    public void print() {
      // Accessing __privateMember would be a compile-time error.
      // InnerClass2 is a top-level class and can only reference its
      // own member variables and the static variables of its lexically
      // encompassing class, InnerClassExample.

  public void testInnerClasses() {
    InnerClass1 class1 = new InnerClass1();
    InnerClass2 class2 = new InnerClass2();


  public static final void main(String[] args) {
    InnerClassExample example = new InnerClassExample();
DevX Pro
Comment and Contribute






(Maximum characters: 1200). You have 1200 characters left.



Thanks for your registration, follow us on our social networks to keep up-to-date