Login | Register   
RSS Feed
Download our iPhone app
Browse DevX
Sign up for e-mail newsletters from DevX

By submitting your information, you agree that devx.com may send you DevX offers via email, phone and text message, as well as email offers about other products and services that DevX believes may be of interest to you. DevX will process your information in accordance with the Quinstreet Privacy Policy.

Tip of the Day
Home » Tip Bank » C++
Language: C++
Expertise: Beginner
Sep 28, 1999



Application Security Testing: An Integral Part of DevOps

Const & Efficiency

Can you tell me which of these implementations is more efficient and why, assumming this function cannot be inlined and is called often?

First option:

int even( int &val){if (val%2==0)
return val*2;else return val;}
Second option:

int even(const int &val){if (val%2==0)
return val*2;else return val;}

I see no reason why there'd be any performance difference between the two. In fact, I compiled them under VC++ 6.0 and the generated code was identical in both versions.

An argument with the const attribute specifies that a given routine will not modify that argument. The compiler then allows you to pass arguments that cannot be modified (declared as const). This is enforced by the compiler at compile time and does not affect the run-time code.

DevX Pro
Comment and Contribute






(Maximum characters: 1200). You have 1200 characters left.



We have made updates to our Privacy Policy to reflect the implementation of the General Data Protection Regulation.
Thanks for your registration, follow us on our social networks to keep up-to-date