Login | Register   
RSS Feed
Download our iPhone app
Browse DevX
Sign up for e-mail newsletters from DevX

By submitting your information, you agree that devx.com may send you DevX offers via email, phone and text message, as well as email offers about other products and services that DevX believes may be of interest to you. DevX will process your information in accordance with the Quinstreet Privacy Policy.

Tip of the Day
Language: C++
Expertise: Intermediate
Jun 28, 2005



Application Security Testing: An Integral Part of DevOps

Passing Pointers Instead of Const Reference Parameters

Usually, you pass const reference parameters to functions like this:

class OneKind;
class AnotherKind;

class Example{
      Example( const OneKind &inParam );		
// conversion operator
      Example( const Example &inOriginal );		
// copy constructor
      const Example &operator=( const Example& inRhs ); 
// assignment operator
      void MemberFunc( const AnotherKind &inParam );
There are many reasons for passing const references—for performance and to preserve polymorphism, as well as to indicate that the object is guaranteed to exist. But if you might be passing a non-existent object, pass a pointer instead—with the understanding that it might be null

Wael Salman
Comment and Contribute






(Maximum characters: 1200). You have 1200 characters left.



Thanks for your registration, follow us on our social networks to keep up-to-date