Login | Register   
LinkedIn
Google+
Twitter
RSS Feed
Download our iPhone app
TODAY'S HEADLINES  |   ARTICLE ARCHIVE  |   FORUMS  |   TIP BANK
Browse DevX
Sign up for e-mail newsletters from DevX


Tip of the Day
Language: C++
Expertise: Intermediate
Jun 28, 2005

Passing Pointers Instead of Const Reference Parameters

Usually, you pass const reference parameters to functions like this:

class OneKind;
class AnotherKind;

class Example{
   public:
      Example( const OneKind &inParam );		
// conversion operator
      Example( const Example &inOriginal );		
// copy constructor
      
      const Example &operator=( const Example& inRhs ); 
// assignment operator
      
      void MemberFunc( const AnotherKind &inParam );
};
There are many reasons for passing const references—for performance and to preserve polymorphism, as well as to indicate that the object is guaranteed to exist. But if you might be passing a non-existent object, pass a pointer instead—with the understanding that it might be null

Wael Salman
 
Comment and Contribute

 

 

 

 

 


(Maximum characters: 1200). You have 1200 characters left.

 

 

Sitemap