dcsimg
Login | Register   
RSS Feed
Download our iPhone app
TODAY'S HEADLINES  |   ARTICLE ARCHIVE  |   FORUMS  |   TIP BANK
Browse DevX
Sign up for e-mail newsletters from DevX

By submitting your information, you agree that devx.com may send you DevX offers via email, phone and text message, as well as email offers about other products and services that DevX believes may be of interest to you. DevX will process your information in accordance with the Quinstreet Privacy Policy.


Tip of the Day
Home » Tip Bank » C++
Language: C++
Expertise: All
Feb 12, 1999

WEBINAR:

On-Demand

Application Security Testing: An Integral Part of DevOps


The Underlying Representation of NULL

C and C++ define NULL differently:
 
   #define NULL 0;                        // A typical definition of NULL in C++ 
   #define NULL  ((void*)0)          // C defines NULL this way
Why is it defined differently in the two languages? Pointers in C++ are strongly typed, unlike pointers in C. Thus, void* cannot be implicitly converted to any other pointer type without an explicit cast. If C++ retained C's convention, a C++ statement such as:
 
   char * p = NULL; 
would be expanded into something like:
 
   char * p = (void*) 0;   // compile time error: incompatible pointer types 
Since 0 is the universal initializer for all pointer types in C++, it is used instead the traditional C convention, and in fact, many programmers simply use 0 as a pointer initializer.
Danny Kalev
 
Comment and Contribute

 

 

 

 

 


(Maximum characters: 1200). You have 1200 characters left.

 

 

Sitemap
Thanks for your registration, follow us on our social networks to keep up-to-date