What do you think? Is HTML a technology stuck in the past, unable to change because of the dependencies of later software, or has HTML just evolved to the point where making further changes simply isn't necessary? Does your career potential rely on your deep HTML knowledge? Do you feel pressure to change to newer technologies, such as XML, XSLT, XHTML, and active content? Why or why not? Let us know in the web.general discussion group
HTML, the Everyman document markup standard, stands still these days as newer technology flows around it. Guest commentator Nigel McFarlane says those whose current jobs depend on their deep knowledge of HTML had better take note.
by Nigel McFarlane
November 5, 2003
TML, that universal and egalitarian documentation format, is now 13 years removed from birth and 10 years removed from the lab. Unless pretenders such as Adobe's PDF quicken their pace, HTML documents will remain the dominant format for publicly accessible content for some time. Few question the egalitarian value of HTML's center-stage position, but for technologists the spotlight is clearly wandering elsewhere.
A Victim of Its Own Success
HTML has been successfultoosuccessful. That's a well known problem typical of mature systems, regardless of the simplicity or naïveté of their origin. That success has led to a growing number of layers built on top of, and dependent upon HTML (see Figure 1).
It's quick, easy and you get access to all the articles on DevX.
This registration/login is to allow you to read articles on devx.com. Already a member?
To become a member of DevX.com create your Member Profile by completing the form below. Membership is free!