Because XML was not designed for data, it has serious ambiguities and constraints. These limitations are hard for many to understand because most articles never address them. ConciseXML, a superset of XML 1.0, aims to solve not only these limitations but also the verbosity of XML.
by Mike Plusch
January 13, 2004
Because XML was not designed for data, it has serious ambiguities and constraints. These limitations are hard for many to understand because most articles and books never address them. A good analogy to the problem is how we've perceived the earth. Hundreds of years ago the prevailing view was the world is flat, because people experience a flat world. Even people who saw the complexity of the flat world continued to justify their view after the logic of the round-world view was quite clear. Imagine the difficulty Columbus had trying to convince people that the world was round. People thought he was crazy.
How is this discussion about a flat versus a round world related to XML? The vast majority of people working with XML today believe in the equivalent of an XML flat world: XML as a syntax for documents. This flat-world view is everywhere; supported by standards, committees, books, and seminars—it is the dominant view for XML. The round world model treats XML as a syntax for data and objects. The differences are slight, but the implications are huge.
It's quick, easy and you get access to all the articles on DevX.
This registration/login is to allow you to read articles on devx.com. Already a member?
To become a member of DevX.com create your Member Profile by completing the form below. Membership is free!
