Explore ASP.NET 2.0 Web Part Infrastructure

Explore ASP.NET 2.0 Web Part Infrastructure

eb applications today do a number of things. A Web site could be a banking site, a content management system, or a news center. In spite of this diversity, it almost always makes sense to break a Web page into smaller, reusable widgets that you can share in any other part of the site or even across sites.

This thinking has lead to reusable widgets such as the header and footer in your system, a huge third-party control vendor market, an emergence of portal Web sites such as or with functional widgets, and the creation of products such as Plumtree and SharePoint Portal Server 2003.

SharePoint Portal Server 2003 and other such products heralded a new wave of technologies that enabled users to create and customize Web sites by merely pointing and clicking at run time. These products came with a reusable and extensible set of widgets that users could drop on the surface of the page, and customize per their specific needs. Given such a reusable set of widgets, and the ability to define their placement, behavior, look and feel, and even communication between them, it thus becomes extremely easy to set up and maintain sophisticated and highly functional Web sites.

It is thus not a surprise that ASP.NET has built-in support for such a widget-based or Web Part infrastructure. Also, it should not come as a surprise that in the future, this Web Part infrastructure will probably gain in importance both inside and outside of Microsoft.

In this article, I’ll examine the basics of the ASP.NET 2.0 Web Part infrastructure. In a future article, I will dive into further details of the ASP.NET 2.0 Web Part framework. But instead of looking at only “theory” and a “rehash of MSDN,” I will instead build a real production Web site. This Web site will serve as my Web site at, which is also where you can download this article’s code.

Author’s Note: Because the Web Part framework uses SQL Server Express out of the box, you will need to install SQL Server Express on your machine.

But before I dive straight into writing code for the Web site, let me begin by discussing the basic components of the ASP.NET 2.0 Web Part infrastructure:

  • Web Part?A Web Part is the reusable widget that the user can drop on to the surface of a Web page, customize it, and define communication with other Web Parts that may exist on the same page. A good way to think of a Web Part is that it is a server control on steroids that fits into the Web Part framework. As you will see further in this article, you can create your own custom Web Parts by inheriting from the System.Web.UI.WebControls.WebParts.Webpart class. You can also masquerade a user control or server control as a Web Part by encapsulating it in a GenericWebPart class. But by doing so, you get limited customization by implementing the System.Web.UI.WebControls.WebParts.IWebPart interface, and at least out of the box, you cannot leverage the inter-Web part communication infrastructure that ASP.NET 2.0 gives you.
  • WebPartManager?The WebPartManager is a server control that ships with ASP.NET 2.0. This is the central policeman of the Web Part infrastructure. It manages all functionality, events, and customization of various Web Parts on a given page. There should only be a single WebPartManager on a Web page. You can run the WebPartManager in one of several display modes. Based upon the current mode of the WebPartManager, the various other “zones” on the page appear or disappear. But what are zones? Zones are areas on a Web page that hold Web Parts, or other controls that let you customize the Web Parts on a page. This will become clear as I show you how to create a small Web site using the ASP.NET 2.0 Web Part infrastructure.
  • WebPartZone?A WebPartZone defines an area or zone on the page that can host one or more Web Parts. Any Web Part inside a WebPartZone inherits the look and feel controlled by the WebPartZone. Also, any control that is not a Web Part can also live inside a WebPartZone. This is done by masquerading the control as a Web Part with the help of the GenericWebPart class.
  • CatalogZone?The CatalogZone holds a number of CatalogPart controls. CatalogPart controls hold a menu or catalog of Web Parts that you can add to a page for the user to choose from. There are three kinds of CatalogPart controls.
  • DeclarativeCatalogPart?The DeclarativeCatalogPart control allows developers to set up a catalog of controls in a declarative form.
  • PageCatalogPart?If you were to choose a control from the DeclarativeCatalogPart and add it to the Web page, the control would now be “opened.” Now if you choose to close the Web Part from the menu at the top of the Web Part, the Web Part will now be closed. The PageCatalogPart maintains a list of closed Web Parts that were previously added to the page. In simpler terms, imagine a Web Part inside a DeclarativeCatalogPart as a class definition, and one in a PageCatalogPart as an instance of that class, with its properties set to user defined values. For example, if a DeclarativeCatalogPart holds a Web Part that has the ability to absorb and render an RSS feed, a good example of a PageCatalogPart would be to imagine two instances of the same RSS Feed control specified declaratively in the DeclarativeCatalogPart, pointed to two different RSS feeds.
  • ImportCatalogPart?The ImportCatalogPart provides UI to the user to add new Web Parts into the system. This is done by “packaging” the Web Part into a standard XML format, and uploading it from a Web-based UI. This helps you create a system where you can add description files for newer Web Parts on a site that is already in production.
  • EditorZone?Most Web Parts need some degree of customization. For instance, a control that renders an RSS feed needs a public string property with the URL of the feed, and perhaps another integer property specifying the maximum number of news items to render. An HTML Content Web Part would need the HTML content specified, and maybe you would also want to specify the title for that Web Part, or maybe even its look and feel. The EditorZone hosts various EditorParts that allow the user to customize the various properties of any Web Part. ASP.NET 2.0 comes with a limited set of EditorParts or you can create your own by inheriting from the EditorPart class.
  • ConnectionsZone?When you have a number of Web Parts on a given page, it is reasonable to expect that some of these Web Parts may want to communicate with other Web Parts. For instance, a Navigation Web Part may want to communicate with another Web Part to load the appropriate content. You can define this communication statically in a declarative form in the WebPartManager, or the end user can specify it dynamically by using a ConnectionsZone.

The Requirements
The best way to learn to swim is to dive right in, but it’s always nice to have a shallow pool and a lifeguard watching. Let us do exactly that. With a basic understanding of the various players involved in the ASP.NET 2.0 Web Part infrastructure, let me help you solidify your understanding by creating a Web site driven by the ASP.NET 2.0 Web Part infrastructure. At the end of this article, you will have a reusable Web Parts-based framework similar to the one I used to set up my Web site.

The Web Part framework and the membership API work together to provide an extremely flexible architecture

I created the following list of requirements for my Web site:

  1. Provide an area where I can discuss my latest books, articles, and speaking engagements that I am currently involved with.
  2. Provide a contact form so anyone can contact me without divulging my e-mail address.
  3. Have a content editor widget (Web Part), which I can reuse anywhere on the site for any arbitrary HTML content.
See also  Comparing different methods of testing your Infrastructure-as-Code

A Bit about Design
This article by no means feigns to be the definitive authority on any software development methodology, but it still makes sense to have some forethought about design. Think of this as sticking your toe into the pool before you dive in, and you just want to make sure there are no sharks in the pool. Throughout this article, my theme will be “laziness” or doing the least to get the job done. In light of that theme, let me talk through the requirements again.

For requirement #1, I wish to have an area where I can discuss my latest books, articles, speaking engagements etc; that sounds like a perfect candidate for an RSS feed. RSS feeds are all over the place, especially on blogs, so it makes sense to stick with my theme of laziness and reuse my current blog. For example, if I have a blog at, I could easily create a category over there and absorb that category’s RSS feed in To do that, I’ll write a custom Web Part that I can drop on the surface of my Web Form. On that custom Web Part, I will add a property called RssUrl, which renders the specified RSS feed of that specific category from my blog on my site.

In requirement #2, I want to provide a contact form where users can enter their name, e-mail address, and send me a message directly from my Web site. I could write a Web Part to provide such a form. But this violates the first commandment of this article, “Thou shalt be lazy.” Even though I could write an ASP.NET server control, or a Web Part (which is very much like a server control) to satisfy this requirement, it is just much easier to do this as a user control instead. In a user control, you can set up the form’s look and feel and various required field and regular expression validators merely by a simple point-and-click operation. Thus this serves as a perfect excuse to demonstrate both my laziness and the extensibility of the ASP.NET 2.0 Web Part infrastructure. Thus I will implement this control as a user control, and use that user control as a Web Part.

For requirement #3, I want to provide a content editor Web Part. I will create a simple Web Part that has a public property called HtmlContent of type string. I can then edit the content inside a single-line textbox. As you will see further in this article, the ability to edit a public property of a Web Part is available to you pretty much out of the box by using the PropertyGridEditorPart. The PropertyGridEditorPart provides you a convenient mechanism to edit public properties of the Web Part decorated with the WebBrowsable (true) attribute. Yes, you could edit complex and fancy HTML in a single-line textbox, but you could also row a tiny canoe all the way to Japan or clean your floor with a toothbrush. These options feel to me like repairing a car engine from the exhaust pipe. Editing complex HTML in a single-line edit box is definitely not convenient.

I will at least provide a TextArea control or, even better, I’ll integrate a full-fledged Web-based HTML editor to provide rich HTML editing capability. Thus I can again demonstrate the extensibility of the ASP.NET 2.0 Web Part framework, by integrating the telerik r.a.d. editor.

Thus, in this article, I will show you how to write three Web Parts:

  1. A Web Part that absorbs an RSS feed and displays it on the Web site.
  2. A user control wrapped as a Web Part that provides a simple contact form with some basic validation.
  3. A Web Part that allows the user to maintain the static content of the Web site as HTML. This Web Part will also involve writing a custom editor using telerik’s r.a.d. editor to give the user a convenient area to type in HTML content.

In addition to these Web Parts, I’ll show you how to write a simple framework to host Web Parts based on the ASP.NET 2.0 Web Part framework. Once you have such a framework ready, you can easily extend this system and add more features by simply writing more Web Parts.

I obviously want to provide access protection to my Web site. Thus I’ll also create a login page to enable the “editability” of the Web site. For anonymous users, however, the content appears as read only. To do this, I’ll leverage the ASP.NET 2.0 framework membership API. The Web Part framework and the membership API work together to provide an extremely flexible architecture. Here’s how to set up the framework.

Setting Up the Web Part Framework
Figure 1 shows what the eventual site will look like. As you can see, this Web site has a default view for anonymous users, which presents the content, but does not allow the user to edit the content.

Figure 1: The site when it is fully done.
Figure 2: The site in edit mode, when it is fully done.

Also, as shown in Figure 2, when registered users log into the Web site, they’ll see a pane on the right that allows them to perform Web site administration tasks. You can see a menu at the top and an “Editor Zone” that holds the telerik r.a.d. editor along with other editable properties. I’ll explain these in detail shortly.

To set up the common look and feel for the Web site, I’ll create a master page to define both the UI and some common logic for the entire Web site.

Setting Up the Master Page
A master page provides a common look and feel as well as some common logic for the Web site. Also, being good citizens of the Web community, you’ll use style sheets to control most of the look and feel and positioning for controls and graphics. You’ll follow these steps.

  1. Create an ASP.NET 2.0 Web site. Since by default, the Web Part framework uses SQL Server 2005 Express Edition (SQL Server Express) out of the box, you will need to install SQL Server Express on your machine. SQL Server Express is installed by default with Visual Studio 2005, or you can download it for free from MSDN.
  2. Add a master page to your Web site and call it SiteMaster.master.
  3. Since every ASP.NET 2.0 page that intends to use the ASP.NET 2.0 Web Part framework must have a WebPartManager, add one to the master page.
  5. Note that I’ve set the Personalization element’s InitialScope attribute value to “Shared” because this Web site has a public face that only administrators can customize. To enforce this I’ll disable the UI that allows customization for all users who are not in the “Admin” role.
  6. Next I’ll add code (see Listing 1) that will render the UI for all users as shown in Figure 1. Since style sheets control most of the look and feel, the HTML becomes extremely simple. At this point you have a simple master page with a WebPartManager on it. The WebPartManager allows you to change the “mode” of the page by specifying a value to the WebPartManager.DisplayMode property. However, you still need to provide the user with a UI that allows the user to specify the current DisplayMode for the given WebPartManager.
  7. As shown in the area to the top and right in Figure 2, this Web site will provide the user with a menu, which is simply the ASP.NET 2.0 Menu control. Thus, go ahead and put an ASP.NET 2.0 Menu control at the appropriate position on the master page, and name it WebPartMenu.
  8. ?
    Figure 3: The site administration menu, visible only to users in Admin role.
  9. Next you have to populate the menu with appropriate administration choices, and a Logout menu item. Also, since you don’t want to make this menu visible to users whose role isn’t “Admin” you’ll write code (see Listing 2) in the Page_Load handler for the master page.
  10. With code in place to render the menu, you can easily write code to handle clicking the menu and perform the appropriate action of logging out the user, or setting the appropriate DisplayMode for the page. Listing 3 shows the code to do that.
  11. Even though you can’t run the code yet (because you are still working on the master page), the code in Listing 2 will render a menu shown in Figure 3.
  12. With the code in place, you can set the WebPartManager’s DisplayMode to Browse, Catalog, Design, Edit or Connect. Table 1 describes these display modes.
See also  Comparing different methods of testing your Infrastructure-as-Code

Table 1: Display modes for the WebPartManager.

Display Mode



The default Display mode. It shows the user customized version of the site, or in this case as the anonymous user would see it. Besides being able to minimize or close individual WebParts, Browse shows the Web Parts in a read-only mode.


Lets you visually drag and drop (in IE) the various Web Parts on the page currently.


Dsplays a catalog of available Web Parts that you can add to the various WebPartZones.


Shows the EditorZone that allows the user to edit the various properties of the current Web Part being edited.


Allows you to connect various WebParts, and define communication between them.

But the Edit, Catalog, and Connection display modes cannot work unless you create complementary EditorZone, CatalogZone, and ConnectionZones on the page. Because communication between Web Parts is a whole other topic, let’s worry about ConnectionZones in another article. For now, you need to add an EditorZone and a CatalogZone on the master page (see Listing 4).

As you can see in Listing 4, a Stylesheet class named AdminZone controls the positioning and look and feel. The Catalog defines a DeclarativeCatalogPart and inside the WebPartsTemplate is where you’ll add the three Web Parts that I’ll show you how to write. Once you do add the three Web Parts to the DeclarativeCatalogPart, the Catalog Zone will look similar to Figure 4.

Figure 4: The CatalogZone with Web Parts added.

Also, the EditorZone contains the four built-in editors that ASP.NET 2.0 supplies. Note the PropertyGridEditorPart, which gives you a convenient way to modify values of Web Part properties that are decorated with the WebBrowsable=true attribute declaration.

By doing this much, you now have set up a common look and feel as well as a basic framework to host and edit your Web Parts in. You can find the full code including the various Web Parts for SiteMaster.master in Listing 5, and SiteMaster.Master.cs in Listing 6.

Next you need to tell the framework how to hook into authentication and authorization. You’ll leverage the membership and role provider, and allow users of the “Admin” role to view the “AdminZone” so they can administer the Web site. Let’s do that next.

Hooking Into Authorization and Authentication
This is probably the simplest part of the entire Web site. You can easily set up authorization and authentication on this Web site by using simple ASP.NET 2.0 concepts. Follow these steps:

Figure 5: The Authentication page for the Web site.
  1. Add a new Web Form to your Web site based on the SiteMaster.master master page and call it authenticate.aspx.
  2. Drag an asp:Login control from the Toolbox to your Web Form. Use the autoformat feature to give it the look and feel of your choice. Figure 5 shows how your authenticate.aspx page should look at run time.
  3. Add the following sections to the web.config file for the site, under the System.Web section.
  5. This web.config tells ASP.NET that you’ll use forms authentication, and that it the login page is authenticate.aspx. Also, the authorization section allows anonymous users to view the Web site. Note that even though anonymous users can view the Web site, they are not able to view the menu or set the WebPartManager in any other mode than Browse, because only users in the “Admin” role can see this menu. Other authenticated users can minimize or close Web Parts, but nothing else. You could easily disable even that, but I won’t go into that for this article. You have already written code to display the admin menu for only admin users in the master page. Now you want to tell the Web Part framework that users in the “Admin” role can enter the Shared Scope. Add the following section to the System.Web element in the web.config file for the Web site.
    Figure 6: The Web Site Administration Tool (WAT ).
  7. With the site setup, now go ahead and administer the Web site using the WAT (Web Administration Tool) at http://<>/asp.netwebadminfiles/ as shown in Figure 6. Under the Security tab, make sure the authentication type is “Internet”, add a few users, and add a role called “Admin.” Also, make sure that at least one of your users is in the “Admin” role.

Adding Pages to the Web Site
With setup completed for the basic site framework and the authentication mechanism, next you need to add two ASPX pages to the Web site.

  1. Add a page called default.aspx (see Listing 7) that will use the SiteMaster.master master page and define two WebPartZones.
  2. Add a page called contact.aspx to define only one WebPartZone, as shown in Listing 8.
Figure 7: Default.aspx with nothing on it (yet).
Figure 8: Default.aspx in design mode, with nothing on it (yet).

When you run the Web site, you should see a default.aspx, as shown in Figure 7. But when you go to authenticate.aspx, authenticate to the Web site, and then choose the “Design” display mode from the menu on the right, the page then looks as shown in Figure 8. Now if you wanted to add any Web Parts to the WebPartZone, those would have been available to add in the Catalog display mode. Now I’ll show you how to write the Web Parts.

Writing the Web Parts
Let me quickly summarize what you’ve accomplished so far. You’ve set up the basic Web pages that will host your Web Parts. You saw that a master page will control their look and feel. You’ve hooked into the authentication mechanism to show/hide the administration menu in the master page. Finally, you added two ASPX pages that have WebPartZones defined on them. If you had Web Parts written, and had added them to the CatalogZone, you could now add the Web Parts to your application, move them around, and edit them as necessary. So let’s go ahead and write the Web Parts.

Writing the RSSImport Web Part
For a class to be a Web Part, it needs to inherit from System.Web.UI.WebControls.WebParts.WebPart. Interestingly, the WebPart class also inherits indirectly from the System.Web.UI.WebControls.WebControl class. This means you can use what you’ve learned about writing server controls and apply that knowledge to writing Web Parts.

This Web Part, or put simply, a special kind of server control, needs to have a public property called RssUrl where I can specify the URL for my RSS feed. Given a URL, the Web Part should be able to absorb the RSS feed and render the results in a presentable form by overriding the RenderContents method. If you look at Listing 9, which shows the full code for this Web Part, you can see two custom classes: RssFeed and RssItem. These classes load the RSS feed as an XmlDocument and present it in strongly-typed business objects. Since that code has nothing to do with ASP.NET 2.0 Web Parts as such, I won’t present it here but you can find it in the Winsmarts.RSSRender project download that accompanies this article.

As you can see in Listing 9, the RSSUrl property is decorated with the WebBrowsable(true) attribute. This setting makes this property editable by the PropertyGridEditorPart control in the EditorZone as shown in Figure 11. Also, the PersonalizationScope is defined as Shared. This means that the personalization is at page level versus being at the user level.

With the project compiled as a DLL, go ahead and add a reference to the Web site project. Then go ahead and add a Register directive at the top of the SiteMaster.master master page, as shown below.

   <%@ Register Assembly="Winsmarts.RSSRender"      Namespace="Winsmarts.RSSRender" TagPrefix="cc1" %>

Also, modify the DeclarativeCatalogPart as shown below.

Figure 9: Default.aspx in CatalogMode with RSSImport ready to add.

Run the Web site and browse to authenticate.aspx. Then login with the userid/password that is in the admin role. Using the administration menu, put the WebPartManager in the “Catalog” display mode. The page would then look like Figure 9.

Figure 10: RSSImport added to the WebPartZone, with no feed specified yet.
Figure 11: Editing properties for RSSImport.

Add RSSImport to WebPartZone2 and you should see something like Figure 10. Now put the WebPartManager in “Edit” display mode. Note that the Web Part itself now shows an Edit menu. Click Edit to show the EditorZone. You can perform a number of customizations to the Web Part, but as shown in Figure 11, you should specify an RSSUrl, a Title, change the Chrome Type to “Title Only,” and then click OK at the bottom of the EditorZone.

You will immediately notice that the RSSImport Web Part pulls in the RSS feed from my blog, and renders it inside the Web Part. Not only that, you can easily drag and drop this Web Part to an alternative WebPartZone as shown in Figure 12. For now, just leave the Web Part in WebPartZone2 and click the “Logout” menu item to view the page as an anonymous user would see it. Figure 13 shows the result.

Figure 12: Dragging a Web Part from WebPartZone2 to WebPartZone1.
Figure 13: Default.aspx with RSSImport, as it appears to the anonymous user.

Writing the Contact Me Web Part
I decided to write the Contact Me form as a user control rather than a server control. Since this article is not about writing user controls, I’ll skip the basics of writing a simple user control that shows a contact form. It is a rather simple user control and you’ll find the code in the “usercontrols” folder in the Web site project.

Using a user control as a Web Part requires almost no additional work. Simply add it to the DeclarativeCatalogPart.


The ASP.NET 2.0 Web Part framework wraps anything that is a control, but not a Web Part, inside a GenericWebPart class instance. You have the option of implementing the IWebPart interface and offer customization to some degree. But by using a GenericWebPart class you lose advanced features such as connections or communication between Web Parts.

Now using a mechanism similar to the first Web Part, you can easily add and customize this Web Part to the contact.aspx form, which has only a single WebPartZone.

Writing the ContentEditor Web Part
This Web Part will allow the administrator to present any static HTML content. As with the RSSRender Web Part, you could easily setup such a Web Part by creating a public property called HtmlContent, then simply write out the value of HtmlContent in the overridden RenderContents method.

You could also decorate the HtmlContent property with the WebBrowsable(true) attribute. This will give you a tiny textbox to edit your fancy HTML. While that will work, it is hardly a good user experience. So the trick is to be able to create a custom editor for this Web Part, and somehow hook the EditorPart to the Web Part. The custom EditorPart is nothing but a class that inherits from System.Web.UI.WebControls.WebParts.EditorPart.

In this example, you’ll leverage the telerik r.a.d. editor to provide the user with a full-fledged Web-based HTML editor. You can create an instance of the telerik r.a.d. editor by overriding the CreateChildControls method as shown in Listing 10.

The EditorPart class comes with two abstract methods that you must override.

  • ApplyChanges is responsible for getting the Web Part being edited right now using the WebPartToEdit property, and applying the values the user specified to the Web Part. Here is the implementation of the ApplyChanges method.
  •    public override bool ApplyChanges()   {      EnsureChildControls();      UIWebPart part = WebPartToEdit as UIWebPart;      if (part != null)      {         part.HtmlContent = htmlContentTxt.Html;      }      else      {         return false;      }      return true;   }
  • SyncChanges is responsible for getting the current state of values from the Web Part being edited, and applying those to the EditorPart. The implementation for SyncChanges for this EditorPart is shown below.
  •    public override void SyncChanges()   {      EnsureChildControls();      UIWebPart part = WebPartToEdit as UIWebPart;      if (part != null)      {          htmlContentTxt.Html = part.HtmlContent;      }   }

Connecting the Web Part to the EditorPart
With the EditorPart written, you need to tell the Web Part to use a certain editor by implementing the IWebEditable interface on the Web Part itself. The IWebEditable interface requires you to implement a method and a property.

  • CreateEditorParts returns an EditorPartCollection. This is where you would instantiate the EditorPart, stuff it in a strongly-typed collection, and simply return it. This tells the framework to use the EditorParts specified in this collection in order to edit this Web Part. Here is the implementation for CreateEditorParts for this Web Part.
  •    EditorPartCollection IWebEditable.CreateEditorParts()   {      List editors = new List();      editors.Add(new HtmlEditor());      return new EditorPartCollection(editors);   }
  • WebBrowsableObject returns an object, which is simply a reference of a Web Part, user control, or server control that will be edited by the EditorWebPartCollection sent back by the CreateEditorParts method. You can implement WebBrowsableObject as shown below.
  •    object IWebEditable.WebBrowsableObject   {      get { return this; }   }

Using the Web Part and EditorPart
With the Web Part and EditorPart set up, go ahead and add them to the master page similar to the RSSRender Web Part. Now go ahead and run the Web site, login using authenticate.aspx, and browse to default.aspx. Switch the DisplayMode to “Catalog”, and add the Html Editor Web Part to WebPartZone1.

Next, switch the DisplayMode to “Edit” and add your custom HTML content and set various other properties as shown in Figure 2.

When you click OK and Logout, you will see the Web site as shown in Figure 1.

The Web site is now complete. Hooray.

But There Is More ?
This article demonstrated the various concepts of the ASP.NET 2.0 Web Part infrastructure by creating the reusable framework that I used to create You can download the code for this entire article from the same Web site as well.

Figure 14: Error, because there is no ConnectionsZone present on the page.

You’d think I’d say, “That’s all folks,” like a cartoon flick after such a long article. The Web Part infrastructure offers you a rich set of features that I scraped only the surface of in this article. This article took a slightly different approach by cutting out per-user customizability. However, I presented just one implementation of the Web Parts framework. I recommend that you experiment with this project by removing the “shared scopes” from this application and watch how the behavior of this application changes with multiple users.

Also, go ahead and click on the “Connect” display mode. Chances are, you’ll see a rude ugly exception as shown in Figure 14.

The exception does make sense. You didn’t add a ConnectionsZone to this Web page! Wouldn’t it be reasonable to expect that in any sophisticated application, you would expect to see one part of the page affect or communicate with other parts of the same Web Page?

In other words, you need a mechanism to establish communication between Web Parts.

In a future article I will explore more deeply into the details of inter-Web Part communication. Also, since the ASP.NET 2.0 Web Part framework forms the basis of SharePoint Portal Server 2007, I will write a good treatise on Web Parts in SharePoint Portal Server 2007.


About Our Editorial Process

At DevX, we’re dedicated to tech entrepreneurship. Our team closely follows industry shifts, new products, AI breakthroughs, technology trends, and funding announcements. Articles undergo thorough editing to ensure accuracy and clarity, reflecting DevX’s style and supporting entrepreneurs in the tech sphere.

See our full editorial policy.

About Our Journalist