devxlogo

Avoid the Diamond Problem when Using Inheritance in Loops

Avoid the Diamond Problem when Using Inheritance in Loops

While multiple inheritance is an extremely useful feature?escpecially in large scale software, it can also lead to a problem known as the DDD, or “Dreadful Diamond on Derivation,” or simply “The Diamond Problem,” shown in the following code:

class ElectricAppliance{  int voltage,  public:  int getVoltage ( ) const { return voltage; }} ;class Radio : public ElectricAppliance { / * ...* / } ;class Tape : public ElectricAppliance { / * ...* / } ;class RadioTape: public Radio, public Tape { / * ..* / } ;int main( ){ RadioTape rt ; int voltage = rt .getVoltage( ) ;   /* Error - ambiguous call. Two  copies getVoltage( ) exist in rt*/}

RadioTape is derived simultaneously from two base classes, each of which has its own copy of the methods and data members of ElectricAppliance. Consequently, the object rt has two ElectricAppliance subobjects. In cases like this, where you need to reduplicate data methods from a common base class, you should use virtual inheritance:

class Radio : virtual public ElectricAppliance { / * ..* / } ;class Tape : virtual public ElectricAppliance { / * ..* / } ;class RadioTape: public Radio, public Tape { / * ..* / }

Now, class RadioTape contains a single shared instance of ElectricAppliance, so there are no ambiguities:

int voltage = rt .getVoltage( ) ; / /OK

Note: Because of the virtual keyword in the base-class portion of Radio and Tape, an instance of ElectricAppliance will have have only a single, base subobject. This eliminates the ambiguities.

devxblackblue

About Our Editorial Process

At DevX, we’re dedicated to tech entrepreneurship. Our team closely follows industry shifts, new products, AI breakthroughs, technology trends, and funding announcements. Articles undergo thorough editing to ensure accuracy and clarity, reflecting DevX’s style and supporting entrepreneurs in the tech sphere.

See our full editorial policy.

About Our Journalist