Login | Register   
RSS Feed
Download our iPhone app
Browse DevX
Sign up for e-mail newsletters from DevX

By submitting your information, you agree that devx.com may send you DevX offers via email, phone and text message, as well as email offers about other products and services that DevX believes may be of interest to you. DevX will process your information in accordance with the Quinstreet Privacy Policy.

Tip of the Day
Language: C++
Expertise: Beginner
Aug 5, 2008



Building the Right Environment to Support AI, Machine Learning and Deep Learning

What Is the Smallest Object Size Possible in C/C++?

Q: What is the smallest object size possible in C/C++?

A: A first attempt to create a size 0 object may look like this:

  class Empty {};
However, the value of sizeof(Empty) will always be greater than zero (it is usually 1). This actually makes sense; otherwise it would be very difficult to perform normal pointer/array operations with such objects. For example, an array of objects with sizeof of zero would have the same size as each individual element. This is described in Bjarne Stroustrup's C++ Style and Technique FAQ (along with empty base class optimization) and in many other places, including C++ standards and compiler manuals.

Some C and C++ compilers allow named bit-field with zero width. However, this is a non-standard compiler extension. Also, the sizeof operator cannot be used to determine the size of a bit-field member.

One also might attempt to do something like this:

   std::cout << sizeof(void) << std::endl;
This is not possible either since void is a special object to which the sizeof operator cannot be applied. Again, it makes sense since no objects of type void can be created.

It is worthwhile to note that some C compilers allow an expression like printf("%d\n", sizeof(void));, but will print the value of one. Also, the following code will print zero when used with some old C compilers:

   struct EmptyStruct {};
   printf("%d\n", sizeof(EmptyStruct));
Again, these examples are compiler-specific and violate standards such as C99.

Thus, the smallest size of an object in C/C++ is one.

Alexander Ocher
Comment and Contribute






(Maximum characters: 1200). You have 1200 characters left.



Thanks for your registration, follow us on our social networks to keep up-to-date