The Possible Deprecation of vector&ltbool> and Its Consequences

The Possible Deprecation of vector&ltbool> and Its Consequences

In the early days of STL, C++ creators decided to include a specialized form of the vector container class, namely vector &lt bool >. In this specialized vector, bits serve as the container’s elements. This decision was plausible and seemed useful at that time. However, the experience gained in recent years shows that vector &ltbool> is problematic in many respects. Furthermore, it contradicts some of the basic requirements with which STL containers must comply. The problem is that vector &ltbool> elements are bits. Yet a bit is not an addressable type&#151you can’t define a pointer or a reference to a bit nor can you allocate single bits using operator new. Thus, algorithms and iterators can’t cope with vector &ltbool> properly because they rely on references and pointers. Worse yet, on most implementations, vector &ltbool> is significantly slower than any other type of vector. The C++ standardization committee is now aware of these difficulties. Chances are good that future versions of the C++ Standard will deprecate vector &ltbool>. Therefore, it’s advisable to avoid using vector &ltbool> altogether. If you need a vector of Boolean values, you can use vector &ltchar> instead.

See also  5 Tips for Choosing the Right Medical Software for Your Practice

About Our Editorial Process

At DevX, we’re dedicated to tech entrepreneurship. Our team closely follows industry shifts, new products, AI breakthroughs, technology trends, and funding announcements. Articles undergo thorough editing to ensure accuracy and clarity, reflecting DevX’s style and supporting entrepreneurs in the tech sphere.

See our full editorial policy.

About Our Journalist