Cybersquatting refers to the practice of registering names, especially well-known company or brand names, as internet domains, in the hope of reselling them at a profit. It is often carried out with the intent to profit from the goodwill of a trademark belonging to someone else. The cybersquatter then offers to sell the domain to the person or company who owns a trademark contained within the name at an inflated price.


The phonetic spelling of “Cybersquatting” is: “sahy-ber-skwot-ing”.

Key Takeaways

  1. Cybersquatting Involves Illegal Domain Registration – Cybersquatting is an illegal activity that involves registering, trafficking in, or using a domain name with the intent of profiting from the goodwill of a trademark that belongs to someone else. The cybersquatter often aims to sell the domain to the rightful owner at a marked-up price.
  2. Anti-Cybersquatting Policies and Laws – Many countries have enacted laws against cybersquatting. One notable American example is the U.S’s Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA) of 1999 that provides a course of action for trademark holders to sue cybersquatters. Internationally, there’s the Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (UDRP) that allows for arbitration instead of litigation.
  3. Preventive and Combative Measures – To prevent being a victim of cybersquatting, businesses and individuals are encouraged to register domain names that are related to their trademark or personal names. If one becomes a victim, hiring a knowledgeable attorney, taking up the issue with domain registrars, or filing a complaint under ICANN’s dispute resolution policy are some ways to fight back.


Cybersquatting is a significant term in technology as it refers to a legal and ethical issue associated with internet domain names. The term describes the practice of registering, selling, or using a domain name with the intention of profiting from someone else’s trademark. Many businesses and individuals heavily rely on their digital identities, and cybersquatting can create confusion, pose substantial challenges to their reputation, or lead to financial losses. It can also involve phishing and fraud, where a cybersquatter might attempt to impersonate a reputable entity in order to exploit user trust. Therefore, understanding the concept of cybersquatting is important for legal practitioners, policymakers, as well as businesses and individuals who operate in the digital world, as it enables them to protect their interests and maintain the integrity of their online presence.


Cybersquatting is essentially a digital real estate strategy, where individuals or entities register, purchase or use a domain name with the intent of exploiting it for their own benefit. The main purpose is usually to profit off a well-known brand or trademark. This is often achieved by the cybersquatter offering to sell the domain to the owner of the brand at an inflated price, thereby taking advantage of the brand’s necessity or desire to own a domain name that matches their brand identity. Hence, these cyber squatters are also akin to digital hostage-takers in the online business world.But selling back isn’t the only way cybersquatters exploit this situation. Some also use the domain parked with a well-known brand name to attract more traffic to their site. Unwary visitors might click on the link thinking they are visiting the official site of the brand they are looking for, thereby increasing the site’s advertising revenue. Other cybersquatters may use the site for more malicious intents like phishing, where they may have a website clone that looks like the official one to trick visitors into revealing sensitive information. So, while the mechanism of cybersquatting may seem simple, it’s used for a broad range of purposes, with varying levels of harmfulness.


1. Madonna vs. Parisi (2000): In 2000, Dan Parisi, an online entrepreneur, purchased the domain name and made it a pornographic website. The pop icon Madonna legally contested this, arguing that her brand had been tarnished. She won the case, and the domain was subsequently transferred to her control.2. Nissan Motors vs. Nissan Computer (2000): This case involved Nissan Motors disputing the domain, owned by an unrelated individual who ran a computer company under his last name, Nissan. The Japanese automaker argued that the domain name was rightfully theirs due to brand identity. However, since Nissan is also a common surname and the individual was using it legally for his business, the court ruled in favor of Nissan Computer.3. Google vs. (2004): Froogle Inc. developed a website using the domain name as an online comparison shopping site. However, Google, which had just launched its own shopping comparison site named Froogle (now known as Google Shopping), sued them for cybersquatting. Although Froogle Inc. argued they had been running their site for a significant amount of time before Google’s service came to light, the court ruled in favor of Google, demonstrating the power of brand influence.

Frequently Asked Questions(FAQ)

**Q1: What is cybersquatting?**A: Cybersquatting is a practice where an individual or entity deliberately registers internet domain names, especially those associated with well-known trademarks or brands, with the intent to profit from them by either selling or leasing them back to the rightful owners.**Q2: Who are the parties involved in cybersquatting?**A: The parties involved typically include the cybersquatter – someone who registers a domain name of interest, and the potential victim – an entity or individual who has a valid interest in the domain due to their brand or trademark.**Q3: Why is cybersquatting considered harmful or unethical?**A: Cybersquatting is considered unethical because it invades someone’s intellectual property rights by misusing their brand or trade name. This can potentially damage a company’s reputation and cause financial losses.**Q4: How can cybersquatting be beneficial to the cybersquatter?**A: Cybersquatters may profit by reselling the domain at a higher price to the rightful owners, earning advertising revenue from the domain, or forcing businesses into buying additional domain names to protect their brand.**Q5: How can businesses protect themselves from cybersquatters?**A: Businesses can protect themselves by registering their domain names early, keeping them renewed, registering variations of their brand or trade name, and watching out for any newly registered, similar sounding domains or typosquatted names. **Q6: What legal actions can be taken against cybersquatting?**A: Victims of cybersquatting can file a legal suit under the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA) in the U.S or through the Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (UDRP) globally.**Q7: Can cybersquatting happen to any type of domain name?**A: Yes. While cybersquatting is often associated with corporate entities and well-known brands, it can also happen with personal domain names, such as the names of celebrities or influencers. **Q8: Are there preventative measures against cybersquatting?**A: Yes, registering all related domain names, keeping a timely renewal, monitoring domain name registrations, and using a trademark watch service can help in preventing cybersquatting. **Q9: How can I report cybersquatting?**A: You can report instances of cybersquatting to the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), file a complaint through the UDRP process, or take legal action in your country if such laws exist. **Q10: What is the difference between cybersquatting and typosquatting?**A: Cybersquatting refers to the practice of registering a domain name of a well-known brand with the intent to profit from it. Typosquatting is a subset where the registered domains are based on common typographical errors made by users when entering a website address. These are then used for profit, to phish, or to distribute malware.

Related Finance Terms

  • Domain name registration
  • Trademark infringement
  • Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
  • Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP)
  • WHOIS database

Sources for More Information


About The Authors

The DevX Technology Glossary is reviewed by technology experts and writers from our community. Terms and definitions continue to go under updates to stay relevant and up-to-date. These experts help us maintain the almost 10,000+ technology terms on DevX. Our reviewers have a strong technical background in software development, engineering, and startup businesses. They are experts with real-world experience working in the tech industry and academia.

See our full expert review panel.

These experts include:


About Our Editorial Process

At DevX, we’re dedicated to tech entrepreneurship. Our team closely follows industry shifts, new products, AI breakthroughs, technology trends, and funding announcements. Articles undergo thorough editing to ensure accuracy and clarity, reflecting DevX’s style and supporting entrepreneurs in the tech sphere.

See our full editorial policy.

More Technology Terms

Technology Glossary

Table of Contents